Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1088

reference
517-tree-1
name
1088
tree-preservation-order

undefined

517-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.022532 50.897631)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.022461 50.897623,-1.022464 50.897637,-1.022474 50.897650,-1.022489 50.897660,-1.022509 50.897666,-1.022531 50.897669,-1.022553 50.897667,-1.022573 50.897660,-1.022589 50.897650,-1.022599 50.897638,-1.022603 50.897624,-1.022600 50.897610,-1.022590 50.897598,-1.022574 50.897588,-1.022555 50.897581,-1.022533 50.897579,-1.022511 50.897581,-1.022491 50.897587,-1.022475 50.897597,-1.022464 50.897609,-1.022461 50.897623)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL